logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.19 2017나35242
약정금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

The defendant's ground of appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance is not significantly different from the argument in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence additionally submitted in the court of first instance is examined based on the evidence submitted in the court of first instance, the fact-finding and judgment of the

Accordingly, this court shall accept the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance in accordance with the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, and shall write down the error in the judgment of the court of first instance and add the following judgments. On the two pages of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part “A law firm shall submit the power of attorney on October 20, 2015” to “A law firm shall submit the power of attorney on October 20, 2015.”

In addition, when an attorney-at-law completes the duties delegated by the client, an attorney-at-law may claim for contingent fees according to an agreement with the client. In such cases, the existence and scope of the final amount of contingent fees to be paid by the attorney-at-law is an appropriate amount within the extent not contrary to the principle of trust and good faith or the principle of equity, taking into account the following: (a) whether the delegation contract is terminated during the handling of delegated affairs or the completion of delegated affairs; and (b) to whom any reason is attributable when the delegation contract is terminated in the course of performing delegated affairs; and (c) the circumstances leading up to the acceptance of the case; (d) the amount of retainer fees; (e) the progress and difficulty of the handling of the case; (e) the degree of effort to pay; (e) the value of the subject matter of lawsuit; and specific interests gained by winning the case (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision

Considering the following circumstances, which can be recognized by the overall purport of the submitted evidence and the entire pleadings, the amount of contingent fees recognized by the first instance court does not seem to contravene the principle of good faith and equity.

The defendant shall be delegated to E Law Firm.

arrow