1. The Defendant’s KRW 50,369,523 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual interest from August 3, 2016 to July 12, 2019.

1. 기초사실 원고는 2010. 4. 27.경 피고가 운영한 ‘C성형외과(2012. 9. 14.경 폐원)’에서 양쪽 가슴에 보형물을 삽입하는 유방확대 수술을 하였는데, 수술 후 염증이 발생하고 가슴 부위 피부가 굳어지며 딱딱해지는 등의 구축(拘縮) 증상이 발생하였다.

As the Plaintiff complained of the above symptoms, the Defendant provided several medical treatment from May 10, 2010 to February 15, 2012, which put the Plaintiff’s chest into tamplone as an injection.

During the course of injection treatment, the Plaintiff: (a) there was a symptoms of melting melting the chest body to the right side of the water leakage number of substances inside a universal object due to the ceiling of the right-side universal object; (b) there was a change in the skin; (c) under the E Hospital operated by D on August 3, 2016, the Plaintiff undergone a re-explal surgery at the “E Hospital”; (d) both chests were not replaced; (e) the skin was not replaced; and (e) the head of the skin was fluent; and (e) the head of the right universal object was dried and observed inside.

At present, the Plaintiff’s skin and the skin structure of the basin are pluged, and as a result, sping phenomenon: sping influoring after the expansion of the basin after the expansion operation to expand the skin by inserting a type of universal material, and the annual installments organization below the skin is sping out, which results in the fall outside of the body. This observation is observed, and there are symptoms of decline in both sides of the sping and sping.

In relation to the above, the defendant was prosecuted as a charge of the injury caused by occupational negligence, and the court of first instance (Seoul Central District Court 2018Kadan998) sentenced the defendant not guilty on July 12, 2018. However, the court of second instance (Seoul Central District Court 2018No2127) reversed the judgment of the court of second instance on January 10, 2019 and sentenced the defendant to a fine of KRW 3 million, and the Supreme Court of Korea (2019Do1458) sentenced the dismissal of the appeal on May 10, 2019 and the above judgment became final and conclusive as it is.

[Grounds for recognition] Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, 8, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 3.