logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.10.29 2018나75926
구상금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with the owner of the Plaintiff’s vehicle C (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), and the Defendant is a person who was driving D urban bus (hereinafter “Defendant bus”).

B. On November 11, 2017, around 11:30, the Plaintiff’s vehicle immediately entered the F building parking lot in the middle-gu E-distance in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si along the five-lane road, and the Defendant, who operated the Defendant bus in the rear side of the five-lane, changed the vehicle to four-lanes as the Plaintiff’s vehicle entered the five-lane, thereby obstructing its course, thereby changing the vehicle to four-lanes, and changed to five-lanes.

C. As seen above, the driver of the Plaintiff bus interested to the six-lanes of the vehicle by interesting the vehicle when the Defendant bus gets light on a multiple occasions and rapidly changed the vehicle’s way to overtake it.

The defendant bus, which had been prior to that, was changed from five lanes to six lanes, passed through the above member-distance intersection, and the driver of the plaintiff vehicle, who was scheduled to make a right-way from the original member-distance, continued to change the vehicle line, and the defendant bus continued to drive down at a speed to the right-hand side of the defendant bus without a right-hand bypassing the course of the vehicle.

However, the above six-lanes are exclusive lanes for the right side of the Defendant bus and the left side side of the Plaintiff vehicle are also in conflict with the traffic island in the middle of the distance, on the other hand, the Plaintiff vehicle, who raised the speed as above, did not avoid the traffic island in the middle of the distance. At the same time, the two-lanes conflict with the driving side of the Defendant bus and the driving side of the Plaintiff vehicle.

(hereinafter “instant accident”) e.

The Plaintiff paid total of KRW 14,867,220 to the repair company, etc. under the name of automobile repair expenses due to the instant accident.

(excluding KRW 500,000,000,000,000). (f) 29 May 29, 2018.

arrow