logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.11.09 2018고단2369
사기등
Text

1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months;

However, the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

Defendant B is the head of the family, Defendant A is the head of the family, Defendant A is the head of the family, Defendant C is the father of the family, Defendant C is the father of the family, Defendant C is the father of B as a person without a certain occupation, Defendant D was the employee of the party upon the exercise of the rights of the court, and Defendant E is the person who operated the party upon the exercise of the rights of the court.

1. Around August 2016, Defendant B, through Defendant D and Defendant E, knew that only if the expenses are paid to employees in the name of L real estate office located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government K, Defendant B created a fake charter contract. The Defendants conspired to borrow money by using the written existing monthly charter contract form of Defendant B, who is the father of Defendant B and his father, and C, who is his father of Defendant B, through the above influence.

2. Joint criminal acts by Defendants B, D, and E: around August 22, 2016, the Defendants conspired to prepare a copy of “the whole lease contract for real estate (multi-family house) signed on March 9, 2016, for the purpose of exercising the private document at the above L real estate office, to which the Defendant B was arbitrarily dismissed.”

M's painting was forged by means of recklessly sealing in the name of the lessor in the name of the lessor, which is a private document on the rights and duties and fact-finding, one copy of the lease contract on the real estate (multi-family house).

3. Joint criminal acts by Defendants B, A, D, and Defendant E: (a) around August 24, 2016, the event of the above investigation document and the fraud Defendants deception I by suggesting I, as if the lease contract under the name of M was genuine, at the office of the victim H’s agent located in Q of the Seoul Jung-gu P Building, as described in the above 2.1; and (b) were delivered from I as borrowed KRW 50,000,000.

(b).

arrow