logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.01.23 2017고단7294
도로교통법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is a driver of Oral Toba in the instant facts charged.

On September 14, 2017, the defendant moved to a two-lane road in front of the Jinandong Enterprise Bank in the Jinanan-dong, the defendant left to the left despite the fact that there was a prohibition of left-hand turn on the surface of the road.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, the evidence alone presented by the prosecutor was aware of the fact that the distance left left as stated in the instant facts charged by the Defendant (hereinafter “private distance in this case”) is a place where the left left-hand turn is prohibited.

The recognition is insufficient, and there is no other evidence to prove it.

A. The Defendant appears to have driven the instant private street each other, and at least until November 2016, the Defendant appears to have been able to turn to the left at the above private distance (the Defendant asserted that the right to turn to the left was set on the surface of the above private distance around August 29, 2017, immediately before the instant case). (B) At the time of the instant private distance, the Defendant did not have a sign prohibiting the left to the left, in addition to the notice prohibiting the left to the left to the left to the left of the road as seen earlier, in addition to the notice prohibiting the left to the left to the left.

The Defendant is possible to turn to the left without regard to the above indication because there was another vehicle on the surface where the left left is prohibited at the time of the instant case.

I think that it has become possible to make a left turn;

As argued, the defendant's defense can be accepted.

3. In conclusion, since the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, it is so decided as per Disposition with the decision of not guilty under the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow