Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and four months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for a year, respectively.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A received a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court on May 23, 2007. On October 8, 2007, the Daegu District Court received a summary order of KRW 3 million for a fine of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving). On May 6, 201, the Daegu District Court received a summary order of KRW 2 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) from the Western Branch Branch of the Daegu District Court on May 6, 201.

Defendant

B On May 16, 2008, the Daegu District Court was sentenced to 6 months of imprisonment and 2 years of suspended execution for the crimes of violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Western Branch of the Daegu District Court. On August 31, 201, the Daegu District Court was sentenced to a summary order of 3 million won of fine for the crimes of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

1. Defendant A

A. From around 22:45 on December 26, 2019, the Defendant driven a F-low vehicle under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.061% of alcohol level from the section of about 4km from the front of the D cafeteria in the vicinity of the Cheongsong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Cheongsong-gun, to the front of the same military Ethm.

Therefore, although the defendant was punished as a drunk driving, he again driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol.

B. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person who is engaged in driving a Fchip car.

On December 26, 2019, at around 22:45, the Defendant proceeded at a speed of about 50km from the front of the Cheongsong-gun G in the front of the Cheongsong-gun, the front of the Cheongsong-gun, the front of the Cheongsong-gun, in the front of the entrance

In such cases, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to check and drive the course safety by properly examining the whole-way left.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in driving a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol and received the part behind the Hing MKS car driven by the injured party B (the age of 58) in the front section of the franchise-free car.

As a result, the Defendant provided approximately ten weeks of medical treatment to the victim due to the above occupational negligence.