The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the reasons for appeal (the imprisonment of two years and four months, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination is based on the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant shows an attitude to recognize and reflect his/her mistake, and that some of the circumstances can be considered in the living environment of the defendant.

However, there is a need to strictly punish a large number of unspecified victims for a crime that causes a large amount of damage, and in some cases, it appears that the defendant had a conclusive intent to take part in the criminal act of licensing. The defendant's participation in the criminal act of licensing is long and the period of the defendant's participation in the criminal act is long and the defendant merely takes part in the role of collecting cash, and it appears that the degree of the defendant's participation in the criminal act of licensing seems to be more serious, such as remitting daily allowances to collecting books or remitting money directly to other accounts, and the defendant's participation in the criminal act of taking part in the criminal act of taking part in the criminal act of taking part in the criminal act of the defendant and the restoration of damage appears to have not been achieved.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the following factors, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, and circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed to be too unreasonable due to the excessive reason.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.