A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 16, 2018, at around 03:15, the Defendant: “C” located on the second floor of the building B in Changwon-si, Changwon-si; “The main customer is going to a dispute, and fright,” upon receipt of a report 112, sent back to the above E, who was requested to return home from the Inspector E, a police officer belonging to the D District Unit, who was called the police officer belonging to the D District Unit, and received the face of the said E and the chest part at three times due to the head of the person who was requested to return home.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of E and F preparation;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph by capturing each CCTV;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act was that the Defendant failed for a considerable period of time, and even though the police officer dispatched to this order solicited him to return home, the crime of this case was committed.

However, the defendant recognizes and reflects the crime.

In addition, there is no record of punishment except a fine sentenced once due to drinking driving.

In addition, the sentencing conditions, such as the age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances, circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be determined as per the order.