The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (two years of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the defendant agreed with the victims is favorable to the defendant.

However, on May 12, 201, the Defendant committed the instant crime during the suspended execution period even though he was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of attempted coercion on May 12, 201, and two years of suspended execution. The Defendant, as an employee of a violent crime group, unilaterally assaulted the victim He who was placed at a time from a distance to another assistance officer, with the victim He, who is in need of six weeks of medical treatment (the injury level and degree is severe), and assaulted the victim Q, who was an employee in the drinking house without any specific reason, and even was dispatched to the scene upon receipt of a report, continued assaulting the victim Q even before the police officer. The nature of such crime is not very good. Considering that the Defendant’s act was committed during the trial of the lower court and intentionally refused to summon with the investigative agency and the court, and thus, the Defendant was arrested until the above suspended execution period until the time and motive of each crime, criminal records, past criminal records, etc., the Defendant’s age of personality and behavior and behavior cannot be considered as unfair in light of the record.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.