1. The defendant shall grant the plaintiff A KRW 8,571,428, the plaintiff B, and C each of KRW 5,714,285 and each of them from July 25, 2012.

Basic Facts

On July 10, 2012, the status network E (FF, hereinafter referred to as "the deceased") of the parties has received the crypical cryption and the right cryption from the Defendant Hospital and received the cryption and the right cryption

7. 25. Death.

Plaintiff

A is the wife of the deceased, and the children of the deceased B and C are children of the deceased.

On June 28, 2012, the Deceased, such as internal history and surgery of the Deceased, was diagnosed as a result of the internal autopsy.

On July 2, 2012, the Deceased was inspected on July 5, 2012 at the Defendant Hospital, and undergone the cT and the ductal sp pyography (CT, dulle Computerized dully) test. As a result of the ductal test, the Deceased showed that “the ductal dulle of the deceased from the front wall to the front wall of the front government, to the front wall and the ductal ductal ductal dunes are observed.” The ductal ducts of variables of the variable annual installments were two caused by the invasion of the cancer, and were easily exposed to the ductal duction and the ductal duction.” As a result of the ductal ducs examination, the ductal ducles showed multiple opinions on the ductal ducleic ducles, the ducleic ducleic dunes, and the ducleic ducleic du.”

Based on the above results of the examination, the Defendant hospital planned to perform the crypology surgery (which corresponds to the crypology surgery among the methods of performing the operation of the crypology, and which is the method of combining the remaining parts of the above upper part on the crypology or the factory side of a small crypology), which minimizes the 2/3 above the deceased, and received a written consent after explaining the meaning of the crypology surgery, the operation method, etc. to the deceased.

On July 9, 2012, the Deceased was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital to undergo an operation, and on July 10, 2012, the doctor H in charge of the Defendant Hospital performed the Babide medication against the Deceased.

However, H is found to exist on the part of the above boundary as a result of the organizational inspection on the part of the above boundary during the surgery.