1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. Facts of recognition;

A. From April 2017 to May 11, 2018, the Defendant served as an employee of the “E” clothes store located in the department store located in Busan Dong-gu, Busan.

B. On September 20, 2018, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 500,000 as to the fact of threatening the Plaintiff as stated in the following criminal facts in Busan District Court Decision 2018 High Court Decision 8557, and the said summary order became final and conclusive around that time.

(2) On June 28, 2018, the Defendant: (a) sold the clothing sales amount set at the Plaintiff’s headquarters on the ground that the Plaintiff was prohibited from receiving unemployment benefits; (b) sold the clothing sales amount set at the Plaintiff’s headquarters in Busan, Busan, the Defendant would have the Plaintiff informed the Plaintiff of the fact of having sold it as if it had been sold in advance; and (c) the sales day photographs recorded in advance the actual sales amount taken and kept in the cell phone were sent to the victim’s cell phone and sent them to the victim’s cell phone, and the Defendant would have the victim know of the fact of having made a false report. The Defendant sent the victim’s cell phone photographs recorded in advance. The contents of the photograph will be better. From July, 2018, E sales place was flick to deliver it to Kwikset. On the other hand, the Defendant would have the victim’s mobile phone text messages sent to the victim.

C. On August 14, 2018, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “emergency stress response” with respect to symptoms, such as severe stress, apprehensions, and depression, arising from the Defendant’s intimidation in the preceding paragraph. From that time, the Plaintiff spent KRW 5,500 in total as medical treatment costs, referring to four times until October 8, 2018.

[Evidence Evidence] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 8, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition as to the cause of the claim, the defendant.