1. Defendant B’s KRW 31,810,708 as well as KRW 15% per annum from January 31, 2019 to May 31, 2019 to the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant B borrowed KRW 100 million from the Plaintiff on January 28, 2010.

B. On January 28, 2010, the Plaintiff and Defendant B drafted a certificate of No. 269 on January 28, 2010 as to the Investment Agreement (hereinafter “instant Investment Agreement”) dated January 21, 201.

C. On January 28, 2010, in the name of the Plaintiff and Defendant C, a notary public of the Promissory Notes (the Plaintiff, the amount of KRW 100 million, the issuer, and the Defendant C; hereinafter “instant Promissory Notes”) drafted on January 28, 2010 the No. 48 of the D Deed No. 2010 (hereinafter “instant No. notarial Deed”) was drafted on January 28, 2010, and the said notarial deed stated that Defendant B entrusted the preparation on behalf of the Defendant C.

On November 10, 201, for Defendant B, the High Court sentenced Defendant B to imprisonment with prison labor for the criminal facts listed in the following table, and sentenced Defendant B to imprisonment with prison labor for a period of two years, which is suspended.

(Seoul District Court 201No. 489, which became final and conclusive later). The Defendant is a person engaged in installment financing business.

1. On July 16, 2009, the Defendant forged a private document with an official seal on the site of the real estate lease contract without authority for the purpose of exercising at the office of the president of the F Institute of Private Teaching in Bupyeong-gu, Seocheon-gu, Busan, with a view to exercising the right at the office of the president of the F Institute of Private Teaching in Bupyeong-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul, with a view to the purpose of using the document: The Defendant stated that “the location: the whole floor of the 2nd floor, the deposit: the Gu0 million won, the monthly rent: Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul: H, I, and the lessor: the Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul Metropolitan City J apartment Kho-gu, Gyeonggi-gu, with an official seal affixed

2. On January 28, 2010, the Defendant presented a forged real estate lease contract to A, who is aware of the fact, for the purpose of securing borrowed money, as if the above contract was completed normally at the office D law firm office in Bupyeong-gu, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City. The Defendant presented a forged real estate lease contract for the purpose of securing borrowed money. Based on this, the Defendant’s right to claim the return of the lease deposit is 90