logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.03.22 2017누89195
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the reasoning of the judgment, is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the judgment on the plaintiff's assertion as follows. Thus, this shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420

2. Determination on addition

A. The judicial branch of Ghana, which is the Plaintiff’s assertion of nationality, is inefficient and efficient, and Ghana’s police also has decomposed and able to move to other areas within Ghana.

The protection or threat of the judicial body can not be avoided.

B. According to the evidence Nos. 5 and 6-1 and 2 of the judgment of the court below, the police officer of Ghana faces problems, such as corruption, etc.

However, the above circumstance alone is insufficient to readily conclude that the Plaintiff cannot be protected by A or the Government in cases where the father and the father of a family are threatened by their relatives as alleged in the father and the father of a family, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

3. The judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow