logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원김천지원 2016.05.19 2016가단246
건물명도
Text

1. The part of the claim in this case seeking restitution shall be dismissed.

2. The defendant is from the plaintiffs 20 million won.

Reasons

1. On July 16, 2014, the indicated Plaintiffs leased the part of the store (A) (hereinafter referred to as “Dcafeteria”) indicated in the order to the Defendant as security deposit 20 million won, monthly rent 1.2 million won, and the Defendant’s delayed payment after June 2015, the Plaintiffs terminated the said lease by serving the complaint. As such, the Defendant received from the Plaintiffs the payment of the remaining money after deducting unjust enrichment from overdue rent and rent 50(3) of the said portion from the foregoing security deposit to the delivery date, at the same time, the Defendant received the payment from the Plaintiffs of the remaining money after deducting unjust enrichment from overdue rent and rent 50(3) of the Civil Procedure Act (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act).

arrow