The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant did not have any fact on November 13, 201, and January 9, 2012, as indicated in the facts charged, against “F stores” (hereinafter “instant main points”) which are the site of this case, and the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged, despite being the first main points of this case on March 26, 2012, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. On November 15, 2012, the following circumstances, which can be acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below and the court below, i.e., victim E filed a complaint with the purport that the defendant does not pay the drinking value despite deceiving the victim on November 15, 201, and the police investigation "3-4 persons, including C and N, of November 13, 201, were the main points of this case. The defendant first appeared at that time, and the defendant had to pay credit prior to the drunken period, but did not give the credit rating. The victim stated the above day and credit rating on January 9, 2012. The victim stated the above day and credit rating on the 5th day of the examination of the witness, and the victim stated the above day and credit rating on the 1st day of the examination of the witness on the 1st day of this case's name and credit rating on the 2nd day of the second day of the examination of the witness."

(See the record of the public trial). (3) The victim's wife G was only the nominal owner in the registration of the business of the main office of this case, and the actual operation was made by G, the wife of the victim.

This receipt.