The defendant is innocent.

1. On July 13, 2009, the summary of the charge is that the Defendant provided D hotel E stores located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on July 13, 2009, and the fact is false to the victim F that “I would pay the drinking value one week if I would provide alcoholic beverage and alcoholic beverage,” although I would not have the ability to pay the drinking value.” The Defendant was provided by the victim with alcoholic beverage and alcoholic beverage equivalent to KRW 2.9 million.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence adopted by this court: (i) in this court, the F stated in this court that “G had the name of F F-friendly job offering H and had it calculated its drinking value”; (ii) because G having the highest level of credit was held liable rather than having the Defendant believed and on the first day, it is natural to regard the credit as having been paid because G having the highest level of credit is held liable; (iii) the Defendant and I stated that “G would go to the above drinking while having the Defendant go to the above drinking,” and (iv) it is difficult to recognize the remainder of the charge as having been presented by the prosecutor in light of the following facts charged.”

3. In conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, a judgment of innocence is rendered pursuant to the latter part of Article 325