beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,00, and by a fine of KRW 1,500,000, respectively.
The Defendants respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On June 14, 2015, around 00:30, the Defendants did not pay taxi expenses in front of the exit of 1270 YYYYYYYYY 1270 YYYYY YYYYYY YYYYYYYYY YYYYYYYYYYYYYYY YYYYYYYYYYY YYYYYYYYYYYYY YYYYYYYYY YYYYYYYYYYYY YYYYYYYYY
As such, Defendant A had a taxi engineer and a taxi engineer in the city of Do wear clothes, and the police officer took a string of clothes and franched the body of the police officer by hand on the ground that the police officer franched the taxi engineer and franched, Defendant A stated that “When the clothes in the franch increased, franched the taxi engineer franched, franched the part of the police sign attached to the fransh by cutting off the outer fransh of the above police officer.” Defendant B franshed the police officer with the above police officer, and franshed the body of the police officer by hand.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the legitimate performance of official duties concerning the maintenance of order of the above police officer by violence.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Statement of each police statement related to F and G;
1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;
1. Defendants of relevant criminal facts: Articles 136 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act;
1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;
1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: (a) in light of the unique characteristics of the crime for sentencing in Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the necessity of strict punishment is high; (b) the Defendants committed contingent crimes; (c) the Defendants divided their mistakes; (d) the Defendants are against themselves and have yet to reach their age; and (e) the Defendants complained against their will while leading them; and (c) the Defendants’ family relation and occupation are considered; and (d) Defendant A committed a crime more serious than that of Defendant B.