Text
1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 219,400,000 with respect to the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from January 22, 2010 to November 3, 2017.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. 1) The Plaintiff’s construction of a public disposal facility for food waste in the Gi-si 206-4, Ji-si 206-4, Jin-si, Jin-si (hereinafter “instant construction”).
(iii) the Korea Environment and Resources Corporation (Korea Environment and Resources Corporation, Law No. 9433, Jan. 4, 2010) has been established in consequence of its merger with the Korea Environment and Resources Corporation in accordance with Article 9 of Addenda of the Korea Environment and
The Korea Environment Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Korea Environment Corporation")
[2] On May 20, 2009, the Korea Environment Corporation entrusted the construction of the instant construction project and publicly announced the design and package deal tender (hereinafter “instant bid”).
3) The instant construction project was permitted to jointly implement the joint procurement through the formation of the so-called consortium. The joint procurement corporation was merged on April 5, 2017, when the trade name was changed to the effective engineering corporation (the effective engineering corporation on October 6, 2014).
The term "Defendant Efficacy Engineering" hereinafter
A) As set forth below, the Plaintiff participated in the instant bidding by organizing a consortium as set forth below, and Defendant Shee Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Shee Construction”).
(B) On January 22, 2010, the Korea Environment Corporation and its representative were selected as a successful bidder. (See Table) The agreement was entered into between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff on January 22, 2010 with the amount of construction work, 11,196,00,000 won, which is the amount of bid, as the amount of construction work. (See the current status of the consortium representative; (ii) the composition status of the consortium representative; and (iii) the proposal is effective per cent per cent per cent per cent per cent per cent per cent per cent per cent per cent per cent per cent per cent per cent per cent. (iv) the Defendant Loba Engineering Co., Ltd. (35%) the Defendant Loba Engineering Co. (15%).
B. In order to be selected as an eligible person for the execution design of the instant construction project, Defendant SIk Construction requested Defendant SIk Construction to participate in the instant bidding formally.
Accordingly, Defendant Shee Construction is the defendant.