logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.06.12 2014고정1365
상해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 23:00 on December 21, 2013, the Defendant: (a) was drunk in front of D on the street in Gyeyang-gu Incheon Gyeyang-gu, Incheon; (b) took an act of lying the victim E’s face on the part of the main car set of the victim E without any particular reason; (c) took the victim E face by drinking the victim’s appeal; and (d) took the victim E breathro, bating the victim E bat, thereby causing injury to the victim E, such as catum salt, requiring approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. The Defendant causing property damage, at the time and place set forth in paragraph 1, destroyed the victim FF’s G rocketing car driver’s seat, which was parked in the process of pursuing E as above, by pushing the said E, and was cut to the said vehicle, and the police officers dispatched after receiving the report as described in paragraph 3 continued to confirm the said vehicle, the Defendant sent the said vehicle to F, stating that “it would be KRW 50,000,000,” was cut to the victim F, thereby damaging the vehicle to require repair cost of KRW 60,500.

3. In the process of listening to the report details and confirming the content of damage by the police officers, etc. belonging to the H district unit of the Incheon Gyeyang Police Station, who received a report at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), the Defendant: (a) when committing an act, such as cutting a motor vehicle to drink as described in paragraph (2), and causing the said I, etc. to be expelled from the said I; (b) when the Defendant was released from the said I; (c) when he was arrested as a flagrant offender, the Defendant expressed his desire to “picker Madro” in the process of arresting him as a flagrant offender, and obstructed the police officer’s performance of duties concerning the restraint of the crime and the arrest of flagrant offender by walking I’s face, etc. at several times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. Each police statement made to E, F, and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate and quotation;

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment against a crime (the point of injury), and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act.

arrow