beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and with respect to the crime No. 1 of the judgment of Defendant B, the crime of 2 and 3 of the judgment is committed.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal record] On August 27, 2010, Defendant A was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment for embezzlement, etc. at the Seoul Eastern District Court (Seoul Eastern District Court) and the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 30, 2011.
Defendant
B On February 10, 2011, the Busan District Court sentenced the suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for six months for fraud at the Busan District Court on April 22, 2011.
[1] As long as the Defendants’ exercise of their right to defense is not likely to substantially disadvantage, the facts charged were corrected ex officio without the procedures for modification of indictment, to the extent that it is not likely that the Defendants’ exercise of right to defense.
- Defendant A, B, and C entered into a contract for construction work equivalent to approximately KRW 43.8 billion for the construction work between K and K around March 2006, with K Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “K”) as the contractor on March 2, 2006, and as the contractor, Defendant A, B, and C entered into a contract for construction work equivalent to KRW 43.8 billion for the construction work between K and K around March 2, 2006. On June 2, 2006, Defendant A entered into a new construction project agreement for K Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “K”) with K Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “K”) on the new construction project for K Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “K”). On June 2, 2006, the Plaintiff entered into a new construction project agreement for K Co., Ltd. on the real estate trust and completed the registration of the instant real estate trust on June 2, 206.
At the time, I borrowed 20 billion won of the PF loan from our investment securities, and received 6 billion won additional loans from savings banks, etc.
Defendant C is a person who had been working as a director from January 2009, and was in charge of the above construction site suspended due to K’s default, etc., Defendant C is a person who was in charge of the above construction site. Defendant B borrowed the opening cost of office around January 2009 by Defendant B around December 2008 and was in charge of the removal construction work.