1. Of the judgment of the first instance court, KRW 127,707,405 against the Plaintiff and its related thereto, from March 28, 2012 to September 3, 2014.

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the liability for damages are as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the modification as follows. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Considering the 17th page of the judgment of the first instance court, “from January 21, 2012 to January 26, 2012” as “from January 15, 2012 to January 18, 2012,” and the part of “from January 15, 2012 to January 18, 2012, the Defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages incurred during the period during which the Plaintiff was unable to deliver the instant vessel after the second accident and the period required to repair the damaged part of the instant vessel due to the second accident, and from February 20, 2011 to December 27, 201, the Plaintiff’s decision was rendered to provide the Plaintiff with an additional effort to prevent the occurrence of the instant vessel from using the instant vessel in compliance with the principle of fair and profit-making loss and considerable amount of damages incurred by the captain and crew members of the instant vessel, and to the extent that it was possible for the Defendant to provide the Plaintiff to perform the instant repair work within 2015 months prior to December 2014.”