1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

With respect to the Defendants, Defendant F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant F”) on March 2013.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this part of the underlying facts is that the pertinent part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to that of the pertinent part, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Defendant 1: “All and management rights” in the last 2th judgment of the first instance court were corrected to “total and Management Rights” and “the third 17,500 shares of the Defendant Company were concluded”; “Defendant 2: (a) was replaced to “the shares of the Defendant Company were to be increased to 10,000 shares in the future; (b) the 5th judgment of the first instance court changed to “A and H were to be inside directors of the Defendant Company; and (c) the Plaintiff B was to receive “the Plaintiff and H received shares of the Defendant Company” in the 5th 6th sentence of the judgment of the first instance court, which revised to “B,” and “the 15th 5th 6th 6th son 1,200 shares of the Defendant Company,” and “the 14th 5th 5th son 1,201,” and “the 2nd 5th son 1, 201,” and “the 14th son 2,” inserted,” was replaced to Defendant 14.

2. The plaintiffs' assertion

A. On November 1, 2012 after the conclusion of the instant contract, the Defendant’s side is the total amount of the Defendant Company’s obligations stipulated in the instant contract with the Plaintiff A.