Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by a fine of 3,000,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

On December 7, 2009, the Defendant entered into a construction contract to newly construct a house on the above land in the total construction cost of KRW 1.1884,100,000,000,000 between E representative director E and E representative director of the corporation at the construction site office located in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Young-gu, Seoul, Seoul, etc., and completed the 6 household accordingly.

Afterward, the Defendant received construction cost of KRW 427,926,00 from the above company from October 30 to April 17, 2011, and received payment of KRW 756,174,00 for the remainder of the payment claim of KRW 756,174,000 from the above company, and completed the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of the Defendant’s son and son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s 590,000,000 for the existing loan and received KRW 220,000 for cash and promissory note’s son’s

On August 11, 2010, M appears to be a clerical error in the bill of indictment of the New Housing in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government as a substitute for the repayment of investment funds for the new housing construction project. However, although the index is considered as P and Q, it seems to be a clerical error.

(B) On July 28, 2011, the Defendant reported a false lien as if the Defendant had a lien on the claim for construction price of KRW 756,174,000 on August 26, 201, by civil execution and civil execution of the Suwon District Court, in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon District Court, in Suwon-si, in Suwon-si, in which the Defendant had a lien on the claim for the construction price of KRW 756,174,00,000, even if the Defendant had a lien on the claim for the construction price of KRW 756,174,00.

Accordingly, the defendant has harmed the fairness of auction through fraudulent means.

"2014 Highest 816"

1. The Defendants’ joint crime Defendant A is a building company (ju) E and G, etc. as to the Plaintiff’s total nine pages, including (ju) E and G, Young-si.