logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.11.02 2017고정1
공전자기록등불실기재등
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On June 5, 2007, the Defendant: (a) knew of the fact charged by the Defendant that he was awarded a successful bid of KRW 16,48,00,000 in the case of Kimhae-si; (b) provided that he was liable for debt borrowed KRW 50,000 from E on August 23, 201, by the Defendant Company D, despite the Defendant’s absence of the obligation to his husband E; and (c) provided a false collateral security that B would offer the said house as security for the said obligation, and sold the said house to a third party.

On September 27, 2011, the Defendant submitted a false document of establishment of the right to collateral security with regard to the said housing at the Changwon District Court of 167, Kimhae-si, Kim Jong-si, the creditor and the mortgagee E, debtor D, debtor D, person who created the right to collateral security, and the maximum amount of the claim 60 million won.

Therefore, the public official who may know the fact has completed the registration of collateral security with the maximum amount of 60 million won for the above housing as the debtor corporation D, the neighboring mortgagee E, and the maximum amount of the bonds.

Therefore, the Defendant reported false facts to the public official in charge, and made it enter false facts in the real estate register, which is an electronic record of the same electronic record as the original copy of the fair deed, and exercised it immediately.

2. The defendant's assertion that he purchased a house Kimhae-si C (hereinafter "the instant house") from his own name, Kimhae-si Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "the instant house"), and he first acquired the ownership of the said house and disposed of it and paid the balance after disposing of it, and that it did not report false facts to the effect that the registration of the establishment of the right to collateral security was completed by Eul, who is the husband, as the her husband, as the her husband, in order

3. Even if the ownership transfer registration has been made for the reason of the most sale on the real property, there was an intention to have the parties make a registration for the transfer of ownership.

As such, the crime of non-performance of the original copy of the process deed and the crime of accompanying.

arrow