logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 남원지원 2017.07.20 2017고합2
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(강제추행)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete the sexual assault treatment program for 40 hours.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 23, 2016, the Defendant, at around 20:23, 2016, at the convenience store office in the E convenience store operated by the Defendant, would not be able to look at the victim F (F) who is a child or juvenile of the child or juvenile of the above convenience store and take a useful fact about the amount that he/she was able to work at the convenience store and she was able to take off the victim's her hand while asked him/her for her, who she was able to have the victim her seated with his/her will and her snow, and she would not be able to take the victim's hand.

It means "the face of the victim" and "the face of the victim is written and able to take the victim's left breast part of clothes, brought the victim's hand into the victim's left chest part, and then will take the victim's body to the victim.

At the same time, the victim, who is frightening due to the above defendant's act, laid the defendant's car into the defendant's car, "I can see so that we can see and clean the victim's left bucks."

Accordingly, the defendant committed an indecent act against the victim who is a child or juvenile.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserts that it is impossible to believe the victim's statement, which is the main evidence of the crime, to request cooperation in the handling of the 112 reported case, and to capture text messages.

However, the victim reported the instant case to the police at the time of the occurrence of the instant crime, and made a consistent statement on the date and time, place, details of the prosecution and the horses and actions the Defendant had committed, as stated in its reasoning, from the time of reporting the instant case to the time of this court.

This is difficult to say if not directly experienced.

The victim did not restrain the defendant from doing the act at the time of the crime of this case, and even after the first indecent act, the defendant was able to board the vehicle on his own.

arrow