The Defendant, not guilty, discloses and notifies information on the Defendant via an information and communications network for three years.

1. The summary of the facts charged: (a) The Defendant: (a) discovered the victim C (or, 15 years of age) who withdraws money from the ESM instruments on September 29, 2015, around 17:20 on September 29, 2015, around 17:20, 2015; (b) discovered the victim’s 15 years of age; and had the victim’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her b

Accordingly, the defendant committed an indecent act against the victim who is a child or juvenile.

2) On September 29, 2015, the Defendant: (a) discovered the Victim F (the age of 17) in the H convenience store located in G in Hacheon-si G on September 18:47, 2015; (b) tried to find out the Victim F (the age of 17) with a view to committing an indecent act; and (c) attempted to see the Victim’s her hand over several occasions; (d) however, the Victim F was unable to resist the Victim’s her arm’s her arm’s length over several times; and (e) failed to fully resist the Victim’s her arm’s length and her arm’s length.

Accordingly, the Defendant attempted to commit an indecent act by force against a child or juvenile victim.

B. On August 13, 2015, the Defendant discovered the Victim K (23 years old) who waits for buses at the bus stops located in JP located in Y I around 18:20 on August 13, 2015, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force by force, by holding the victim’s her son and her son her son her son her son her son her son her son her son her son her son her son her son her but her son her son her at the victim’s her seat, even though her her son her her son her her

(c)

On February 18, 2016, 2016, the Defendant: (a) 15:50 L in writing L on February 18, 2016, 201, the victim N(n, 15 years of age) was placed in the front of the M kindergarten, followed by the buckbucks of the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant committed an indecent act against the victim who is a child or juvenile.

2. We examine ex officio whether the defendant had the ability to discern things or make decisions due to mental or physical disorder at the time of committing the crime stated in the facts charged.

Determination of whether or not there is a mental disorder and degree as stipulated in Articles 10(1) and 10(2) of the Criminal Code is a legal judgment and opinion of a specialized appraiser.