logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2020.01.30 2019고정292
전기통신사업법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one may intermediate a third party's communications using telecommunications services provided by a telecommunications business operator or provide such services for a third party's communications.

Nevertheless, around June 2019, the Defendant accepted the proposal that “it is possible to lend up to 50 million won to a maximum of 12 online calls,” from a person who had misrepresented the lending business operator at the time of the end of the Gu-Si.” On July 2, 2019, the Defendant opened the 12 unit of D Internet telephone (E, F, G, H, H, I, J, K, L, M, N,O, P), and thereafter provided Kwikset service provider with 12 unit of the above Internet phone call to the provider of Kwikset service who sent the false name, and telecommunications service provided by the telecommunications business operator for the use of another person’s communications.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made by the police to Q Q;

1. Report of investigation (for example, tracking over subscribers to criminal telephones);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as the current status of commodities admitted to membership, details of dialogues, business registration certificates, etc.;

1. Article 97 subparagraph 7 of the Telecommunications Business Act and Article 30 of the relevant Act on criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow