beta
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
Reasons
1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or each of the following facts can be acknowledged by adding evidence Nos. 1-2, 2, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, and 14, evidence No. 1-2, and evidence No. 1-2, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, and 14, as a whole, to the statements or images of evidence No.
On June 8, 2004, the Defendant entered into a lease agreement with G at the time with respect to the instant building (the instant building, collectively, of Class 2 neighborhood living facilities (manufacturing Business) of Class 1 floor in the steel-frame sloping roof, Class 1 neighborhood living facilities (retail stores) of Class 96 square meters on one floor in the steel-frame sloping roof, hereinafter referred to as “instant building”). The Defendant entered into a lease agreement with G, who was the owner of the instant building site, to produce, sell, and construct writing, crowdfunding, box, box, and board board, etc. with the trade name “F” in the instant building. On June 29, 2004, the owner of the instant building and its site changed into E on July 10, 2004, the lease deposit was KRW 10,000,000 and KRW 10,000,000,000 or KRW 40,714,204.
B. The Plaintiff is the implementer of the “B Bogeumjari Housing District Development Project” designated and publicly notified as a housing zone by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs public notice, H, I, and J (hereinafter “instant project”). On December 12, 201, the Plaintiff completed the registration of transfer of ownership on the ground of a consultation on the land for public use on December 7, 201 under the Plaintiff’s name with respect to the land for public use on December 12, 201 with respect to the land of the instant project zone, C, 624 square meters (Ga: the former owner; hereinafter “former owner”); and D, the land for the instant building, which is the site for the instant building. In addition, the Plaintiff completed the registration of transfer of ownership on the ground of a consultation on the land for public use under the name of the Plaintiff.
C. As between E on May 18, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a business compensation agreement with respect to the instant building and the septic tanks installed in the instant building (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant building, etc.”), as follows, and up to September 28, 2012.