beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Around May 2012, the Defendant: (a) the Defendant: (b) the Defendant: (c) the Victim C, who was in his operation, closed the business of his default; and (d) was unable to repay the amount due to the economic difficulties; (b) the Defendant lent the card to the victim C to use it for living expenses, educational institute expenses, etc.; and (c) was used for a considerable period of time by lending the check card connected to the account of the victim’s credit card
Around June 2015, the Defendant concluded that “D” factories located in Gyeonggi-gu, Gyeonggi-gu, Gyeonggi-gu, Gyeonggi-do, Gyeonggi-do, and that “A” was purchased by the Defendant in collaboration with the wife at KRW 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000
However, there was no money to be received from the Defendant, and there was no fact that the Defendant purchased the house jointly with the wife, and there was no intention or ability to pay the debt amounting to approximately KRW 170 million at the time, and there was no tax burden or ability to pay the debt amounting to KRW 170,000,000, and there was no particular income from the victim.
The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, into an account in the name of child F from the victim who is affiliated therewith;
6.26.10 million won around 26.1 billion won, and the same year.
7.1.Around January, 2000 won, a total of KRW 25 million, has been remitted as a loan, and shall be obtained through fraud.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. C’s legal statement;
1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted to the effect that they did not have any false statement to the victim as stated in the judgment of the defendant, and that they had the intent and ability to repay the borrowed money.
It is stated that C has consistently requested the victim to lend money from the investigative agency to this court, as stated in the decision of the defendant.