logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2012. 06. 22. 선고 2011누37840 판결
법인의 대표이사가 실제 토지를 취득하였다 양도한 것으로 인정되므로 양도소득의 귀속자로 본 처분은 적법함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Suwon District Court 201Gudan806 (No. 26, 2011)

Case Number of the previous trial

early 2010 Heavy2181 ( December 23, 2010)

Title

Since it is recognized that the representative director of a corporation has acquired the actual land, this disposition is legitimate as the person to whom the capital gains accrue.

Summary

(1) It is difficult to see that the representative director of a corporation has purchased the land or acquired the land before the date on which the corporation acquired the land because of the fact that the representative director of the corporation completed the ownership transfer transfer due to the sale of the land after the closure of the corporation and the fact that the debtor was established as the representative director after the completion of the

Cases

2011Nu37840 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff and appellant

XX

Defendant, Appellant

Head of the Pakistan Tax Office

Judgment of the first instance court

Suwon District Court Decision 2011Gudan806 Decided September 26, 2011

Conclusion of Pleadings

May 4, 2012

Imposition of Judgment

June 22, 2012

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Pursuant to the claim and the purport of appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The defendant's disposition of imposing capital gains tax of KRW 000 and penalty tax of KRW 000,000 against the plaintiff on December 1, 2009 shall be revoked.

Reasons

The reasoning of this court's judgment is the same as the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is accepted by Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow