logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
red_flag_2
(영문) 부산고등법원 2015. 5. 27. 선고 2014나8301 판결
[법무사사무원승인취소처분무효확인등][미간행]
Plaintiff and Appellant

Plaintiff (Attorney Jeon Soo-ho, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

Defendant, Appellant

Busan Local Certified Judicial Scriveners (Law Firm C&K, Attorneys Kang Chang-ok, Counsel for defendant-appellant)

April 22, 2015

The first instance judgment

Busan District Court Decision 2014Gahap8946 Decided November 21, 2014

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The judgment of the court of first instance is revoked. The defendant's approval for employment of a certified judicial scrivener on June 9, 2014 against the plaintiff is confirmed to be null and void (the plaintiff was sought at the court of first instance for confirmation of invalidation under Article 54 of the Rule of the Busan Local Certified Judicial Scriveners Association, and the part of the lawsuit was withdrawn in the trial).

Reasons

1. Quotation of the first instance judgment

The reasoning of the judgment made by the court on this case is as follows: (a) other than eliminating the part of the judgment of the court of first instance “1. The judgment on the legality of the claim to nullify the invalidity of the rules among the lawsuits in this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance; (b) thus, it is accepted as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act (the plaintiff basically repeats the same argument in the court of first instance even in the trial; and (c) even if the plaintiff examines some supplementary arguments

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

Judges Dok-ho (Presiding Judge)

arrow