The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On October 24, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 11:00 on October 24, 2014, and around 1006, the victim E (the age of 62) around 103 Dong-dong, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, and the Defendant committed assault against the Defendant, either by leaving his or her his or her father’s residence outside his or her her her son’s son’s son’s son, thereby

As a result, the defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the side of the left-hand side, which requires two weeks of the treatment period, from the injury of the victim.

2. The evidence as shown in the above facts charged includes the E and F’s statement and the diagnosis of injury to E. However, in light of the situation before and after the time of the instant case, the witness G’s statement in the fourth public trial protocol, the witness H’s legal statement, etc., each of the E and F’s statement is difficult to believe. The injury diagnosis report was made on the basis of E’s statement, and it was made on the basis of the E’s statement, and as long as it is impossible to believe the E’s statement as above, the above injury diagnosis report alone led to the Defendant’s injury by harming the E.

It is difficult to see it.

The remainder of the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to admit the above facts charged, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

3. In conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, a judgment of innocence is rendered after the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, but the summary of the judgment is not publicly announced under the proviso of Article 58(2) of the Criminal Act