logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2016.04.27 2016고정109
초지법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

If a person intends to divert grassland for any other purpose 25 years after the creation of grassland is completed, he/she shall report it to the head of the competent Si/Gun/Gu.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not file a report on the diversion of grassland on two parcels, such as Jeju-si, Jeju-do, and D, each of which was created as grassland in 1978 and 1979, and cultivated bean without permission on the land of 13,600 square meters in total area of the said two parcels from around 2012 to the present.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the accusation of the Jeju market, E's statement, the unit price for the development of grassland, and the standard amount of payment for the creation of alternative grassland, the defendant's confirmation, location map, on-site photographs, the ledger of permission for the development

1. Relevant legal provisions and choice of punishment for facts constituting an offense: Articles 30 and 23 (3) of the Grassland Act;

1. Attraction of a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Provisional payment order: It shall be decided as per the Disposition for not less than Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

The circumstances favorable to the reasons for sentencing: At Jeju, C is the ownership of the defendant's children, and there is no provision of punishment as a violation of the Grassland Act.

arrow