Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 18, 2016, the Defendant who damaged property: (a) while drinking alcohol within the “D” operated by the Victim C in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on December 18, 2016; (b) upon the occurrence of a crypt and dispute, the Defendant did so; (c) while drinking alcohol within the “D” operated by the Victim C; and (d) upon the occurrence of a crypt and dispute, the Defendant did

It has lowered the glass partitions so that the above partitions owned by the victim can be damaged to cover the costs of replacing the victim.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties on the ground that the police officer F, who was a police officer belonging to the Seoul Southern Police Station E box, called out after receiving 112 report at the time and place set forth in the above paragraph (1), tried to photograph the Defendant as a Kamera (hereinafter “Sacam campaign”) for the purpose of shooting the Defendant’s desire.

While taking the bath as “Iskin, I opened the Kameras by hand, and again took a bath to F, “F”, which read “F’s snick, dead snick,” and obstructed police officers’ legitimate performance of duties concerning reporting duties and maintenance of public order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement concerning G and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing evidence photographs;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of obstructing the performance of official duties), and the selection of fines for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not mean that the Defendant assaults a police officer who performs official duties at the least one-way site after receiving 112 reports. However, the nature of the crime is not somewhat weak, the Defendant is in profoundly against the Defendant’s intent to commit the crime in this case, the Defendant does not want the Defendant’s punishment by mutual consent with the victim C, the Defendant was committed contingently under the influence of alcohol, and the Defendant has been subject to criminal punishment until now.