beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant was in the process that C’s operation D intended to re-subcontract part of the Orawal Center construction in the Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-do, where the final order was given, the Defendant merely called “provisional contract” from C to re-subcontract the transport part related to the F Corporation. However, as the Defendant had already received a subcontract for the Suwon-si Construction, he had the victim G by making a false statement as if he had already been performing the construction work.
1. On February 16, 2011, the Defendant: (a) made a false statement that “the Defendant would start a construction site in the vicinity of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, through H, to pay the victim KRW 1 million within one month if he/she borrowed a part of the starting expenses for the construction site in the middle of Jongno-gu, Seoul; (b) he/she received KRW 1 million from the victim to the bank account in the name of the Defendant under the name of the first bank under the name of the first bank as the expenses for the start of the same day.”
2. On March 4, 2011, the Defendant continued to conclude that “the Corporation is proceeding well by the Corporation, and the Fund is insufficient. If the Corporation lends KRW 50 million to the Corporation’s funds, it shall be repaid at once a month, and 25% of the interest shall be given to the Corporation’s profits.” On the same day, the Defendant receives from the victim a transfer of KRW 11 million to the Japanese bank account in the name of the Defendant’s name on the same day.
3. Continuously the defendant has committed the same harm.
4. Around 15. Around the 15.m., in the vicinity of the Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Resignation, the victim shows a transport contract in the name of C Operation D, and “the cost of the construction project is well performed as scheduled. It is insufficient to lend the construction project cost.” On the contrary, the victim was transferred KRW 23 million from the victim to the bank account in the name of H as construction cost.
Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim and receives a total of KRW 35 million from the victim three times, respectively.