logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.06.18 2014나8090
채무부존재확인
Text

1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

on March 21, 2013, G in the F of 08:00 regular Eup.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following modifications or additions, and therefore, it shall be quoted as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Under the 3th judgment of the first instance court, 9th "Defendant A" was applied to "Defendant A", and 2th "Bmer Defendants" in the same line was applied to "Appointed B, C, D, and E".

The first instance court's 4th 1st 4th 1st am " [11] Automobile Injury and / [12] The "Self-Physical Accident" shall be used as "[11] Self-Physical Accident and / [12] Automobile Injury, and the 4th am and 5th am "A passenger car (including the general passenger car and multi-purpose passenger car)" as "A passenger car (including the multi-class 1 and Class 2 passenger car)", and the 9th am "A 1 and 4th am" shall be added to "B", and the 2nd am and 6th am under the same am "Defendants" as "Defendant and Selection B, C, D, E (hereinafter "Defendants, etc.")".

After the judgment of the first instance court 5th 1, “Guide 1” is added to “(On the other hand, the defendant et al. did not submit any rebuttals for three months after receiving the written statement of grounds of appeal by the defendant et al., and thus, the means of attack and defense presented in the plaintiff’s response thereafter shall be dismissed as the means of attack and defense presented in the plaintiff’s response. However, there was no new assertion that the plaintiff did not assert in the first instance trial, and otherwise, it cannot be deemed that the defendant could have delayed the conclusion of the lawsuit by submitting the means of attack and defense intentionally or by gross negligence, and thus, the above assertion by the defendant et al.

The six pages 6 of the judgment of the first instance court shall be referred to as "Defendant, etc.", and the "Witness G" of the same 7 pages shall be referred to as "Defendant, etc." and the "Witness G" of the same 7 pages as "Witness G of the first instance court."

"No. 4, 7, and No. 1 of A" at the bottom of the 7th judgment of the first instance, 6 and 7.

arrow