1. The defendant dismissed the plaintiff from office of directors and directors with the power of representation, directors C, D, and E, respectively, and F.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Defendant corporation is a medical corporation established for the purpose of establishing and operating a medical institution on March 18, 2015. The Plaintiff is a medical corporation established for the purpose of establishing and operating a medical institution, and the board of directors resolution by the Defendant corporation from June 17, 2016 to June 12, 2017 (hereinafter “instant board of directors resolution”).

(2) A director with the power of representation of the Defendant Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “chief director”) before his dismissal.

(2) The directors of the Defendant Corporation were comprised of G, H, I, J, and K5. However, on June 17, 2016, the Plaintiff was appointed as the chief director and the board of directors on December 16, 2016, appointed C, D, and E as additional directors and was composed of nine members. On April 14, 2017, the board of directors appointed L, M, and N as additional directors and constituted 12 members at the time of the resolution of the board of directors of the instant case.

3) On April 14, 2017, theO was appointed as an auditor at the board of directors of the Defendant Corporation. (b) On May 22, 2017, G, including the Plaintiff, issued a notice of convening the board of directors (hereinafter referred to as “instant notice of convening the board of directors”) to the directors of the Defendant Corporation, including the Plaintiff, at around 13:00, on June 12, 2017 with the consent of a majority of the registered directors pursuant to Article 21(5).

2. The Plaintiff attended the board of directors of the instant case with the consent of a majority of the directors when the notice of convening the board of directors of the instant case is given. The Plaintiff did not provide a written notice to the auditor when convening the board of directors of the Defendant corporation, and did not provide a written notice to the auditor when the board of directors of the instant case is called. The Plaintiff did not have voting rights in the articles of incorporation to the chief director even if he was dismissed.