A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

On May 27, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 13:25 on May 27, 2013, 2013, at around 13:13:25, the Defendant: (b) divided the first class of the C building 202, and confirmed inside the window that is not corrected; (c) intruded inside the window without correction; and (d) carried one gold hack (700,000 won) and one cash 10,000 won at the market price of the victim’s ownership in the Ansan-gu, Ansan-gu, Daegu (202).

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the victim's residence and stolen the victim's property.

around 14:20 on March 18, 2013, the Defendant, “2013 Godan6795,” went into the F apartment 102 Dong 209 in Daegu-gun Simgu, with one five per cent of five per cent of five per cent of five per cent of five per cent of five per cent of the market value owned by the victim who was in the inner balp, and was in the inner balp, after the victim G intruded through a bea window that was not corrected between the victims’ house and the house balp. 209.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the victim's residence and stolen the property.

Summary of Evidence

"2013 Highest 6255"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and H;

1. "Written photographs, such as the site, etc.";

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. G statements;

1. A report on appraisal with a State;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographable documentary records;

1. Articles 319 (1) and 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent offenders, despite the fact that the defendant had been sentenced to the suspension of the execution of 2006, committed a crime that intrudes upon his/her residence and steals property repeatedly as stated in its reasoning despite the fact that he/she had been sentenced to 2 years of imprisonment in 2006, and that such crime is prejudicial to the peace of the victim’s residence, there is a need for strict punishment of the defendant in light of the fact that the crime

However, the defendant is in depth divided into his mistake, agreed with the victim G, the damaged goods have been returned to the victim D and the damaged damage has been restored, and the age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment of the defendant has been other.