The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (one year of imprisonment, confiscation, and collection) is too heavy.

2. The Defendant asserts that the sentencing should be taken into account in the sentencing that cooperation was given to narcotics investigation.

First of all, it is considered that the cooperation of the defendant on narcotics investigation in 2017 is about the defendant.

The Defendant informed a drug offender M and N on October 18, 2017.

The argument is asserted.

However, according to the Busan Police Station's response to the fact-finding on January 29, 2018 by the Busan Police Station on cooperation in the investigation of the defendant's narcotics in the trial of the party, the above people are arrested, but this does not result in the defendant's information.

Next, the defendant's cooperation for narcotics investigation in the year 2018 shall be considered as follows.

On February 19, 2018, the Busan Police Station's response to inquiry on the cooperation of the defendant's narcotics investigation in the trial.

Examining the detailed contents, the defendant's wife informed the O of the drug offender and is currently under investigation.

In this case, the defendant seems not to be related to the drug crime of this case.

② The Defendant’s cooperation in narcotics investigation was already reflected in the sentencing judgment of the lower court.

(3) In the light of the addiction of narcotics and the harm caused by medication of narcotics, narcotics crimes need to be eradicated by asking strict criminal responsibility.

Considering the above circumstances, the Defendant was in charge of the investigation into the aboveO to a certain extent.

Also, it is difficult to view the lower court’s judgment as an investigation cooperation to the extent of changing its sentencing.

In addition, the lower court’s determination of sentencing exceeded the reasonable bounds of its discretion, in full view of all the conditions of the present arguments and the records, including the favorable circumstances (a confession, a cooperation in investigation, etc.) and unfavorable circumstances (including the fact that the act of selling philophones is included in the crime of selling philophones, and the quantity of philophones possessed), etc., including the Defendant’s age character and character intelligent environment, motive means of committing the crime, and the circumstances after committing the crime.