A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates an officetel sexual traffic business establishment in the name of “C” in heading 209, 308, 317, 336, and 341 of the building B in Silung-si.

Around 14:00 on March 18, 2014, the Defendant received 130,000 won in cash from male customers who are unable to know their names from the stairs of the second floor of the instant officetel as the price for commercial sex acts. On the same day, the Defendant: (a) had female employees waiting for the above officetel 308 do sexual intercourse with the above customers; (b) received 140,000 won in cash from male customers whose names are unknown from the stairs of the second floor of the instant officetel at around 20:00 on the same day; (c) had them attend the said officetel as the price for commercial sex acts; (d) had them receive 140,00 won in cash from male customers who are waiting for the above officetel at around 21:0 on the same day as the price for commercial sex acts; and (e) had them offer 30,000 won in cash from around 21:0 to around 36, 201 to 36,000 employees waiting for commercial sex acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of G and E;

1. A written statement prepared by I and J;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Field control photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on real estate lease agreement;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of Imprisonment with labor concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc.;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act, the former part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. According to the evidence of this case under the latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, the Defendant is from December 1, 2013 to March 17, 2014.