logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.09.29 2016고정584
절도
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who has no fixed occupation.

1. On October 15:23, 2015, the Defendant: (a) laid the cell phone on the second floor of the Cheongju-si building C, Cheongju-si; (b) laid the cell phone on the 2nd floor; and (c) laid the crepit of the surrounding cell phone; (d) laid the cell phone on the 2nd floor of the Cheongju-si building; and (e) laid the crepit of the surrounding cell phone and laid the back door.

As a result, the defendant stolen the victim's market value of 770,000 won, which is equivalent to Samsung jugal jun (c.e., white).

2. On February 13:14 of the same year, the Defendant, within the “F” located in Cheongju-si E, Cheongju-si, the main business owner of the Cheongju-si G (Y, 29 years old), consulted the other customers, and put one mobile phone in a mobile phone that was being charged by taking advantage of the gaps in which surveillance around the crepan is neglected.

As a result, the defendant stolen the victim's market value of 900,000 won, which is equivalent to S6 mobilephones.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the accused;

1. Each police statement made in relation to G or D;

1. Application of statutes on records of seizure and lists of seizure;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. A fine of 700,000 won for which the sentence is suspended; and

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (the period computed by converting the amount of KRW 100,000 into one day) by the detention in a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Sentence (the partial damage was recovered, and the defendant was in the second degree with a significant change of status) or more of the Criminal Code.

arrow