logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1980. 7. 22. 선고 80도845 판결
[국가보안법위반·간첩·반공법위반][공1980.9.15.(640),13055]
Main Issues

Objects of acts of espionage

Summary of Judgment

In general, even if the fact is widely known to the people, all matters of interest in Korea, which are not known or confirmed by the enemy, are subject to acts of counter-espionage.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 98 of the Criminal Act

Reference Cases

Supreme Court Decision 68Do1825 Decided February 25, 1969

Defendant-Appellant

Defendant

Defense Counsel

(National Ship) Attorney Kim Jong-hwan

original decision

Seoul High Court Decision 80No109 decided March 19, 80.

Text

The final appeal is dismissed.

70 days of detention prior to sentencing shall be included in the principal sentence.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal by the defendant and defense counsel are examined.

Measures to recognize the fact of the principal offense by the timely evidence of the judgment of the court of first instance that the original judgment maintained by him, are properly recognized, and it is difficult to say that there is an illegal cause in documentary evidence.

In addition, there is a view that the Supreme Court's precedents have been followed that even if the facts generally known to our people are widely known to the people of the Republic of Korea, all the matters of interest in the Republic of Korea are subject to acts of counter-espionage. Therefore, it is difficult to say that there is a misapprehension of the legal principles on the measures that consider collection of matters pointing out by the original judgment

It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench, for the reason that the original judgment is right and wrong.

Justices Lee Il-il (Presiding Justice)

arrow