1. The plaintiff (consolidated defendant)'s main claim is dismissed.

2. The plaintiff (consolidated defendant) is the defendant (consolidated plaintiff) with KRW 4,582,540.

Based on the facts, the Plaintiff, from September 30, 2010 to September 30, 2015, leased the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter referred to as “instant building”) to the Defendant as KRW 10,000,000, annual rent of KRW 40,000,000.

(hereinafter “Lease of this case”). The Defendant had conducted accommodation business in the building of this case during the above lease period.

On September 30, 2015, the expiration date of the lease term, the Defendant removed all the facilities, including signboards installed in the instant building, and delivered the said building to its original state. Of the instant building, on February 25, 2016, the Defendant, on the first floor parking lot of the instant building, 70 slicks and did not collect slicks.

According to the appraiser C’s appraisal, the rent from October 1, 2015 to February 25, 2016 is KRW 1,587,732 of the parking lot 223.13 square meters of underground among the instant buildings.

[Based on the fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, Eul evidence No. 13-1 through 12, Eul evidence No. 13-1 and Eul evidence No. 13, the appraisal result by appraiser C, and the appraisal result by appraiser C, the above recognition facts are as to the grounds for the claim for judgment as to the claim for judgment as to the claim as to the purport of the entire pleadings. According to the above recognition facts, although the lease of this case was terminated on September 30, 2015, the defendant occupied the parking lot No. 223.13 square meters in the underground floor of the instant building until February 25, 2016, barring any special circumstance, the plaintiff is obligated to pay 1,587,732

The defendant asserts that the defendant's defense was entitled to occupy the building of this case because the plaintiff did not return the lease deposit.

In full view of the purport of the entire argument in the statement No. 2, it is recognized that the Plaintiff has not paid the deposit to the Defendant after the completion of the lease of this case.

The plaintiff's re-defense plaintiff shall pay electricity rates of 4,89,270 won, gas facilities of 115,00 won, which the defendant must pay as the lessee at the time when the defendant delivers the building of this case.