logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.04.10 2015고단203
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 16, 2014, at around 22:40, the Defendant: (a) the victim’s main point of the “D” operated in Gwangju Northern-gu, Gwangju Northern-gu, where the Defendant had a horse or dispute while talking with drinking and drinking; (b) the Defendant: (c) broken a beer who was on the table on the table for the reason that the c has broken away with the partitions set up at the main point; (d) the victim’s objection against this, “I will die. I will die. I will die. I will see the police report; (d) the Defendant damaged the entrance of the above main room so that 10 children, which was on the table of the table, can be kept favorable, such as the entrance, ceiling, wall, floor, etc., and damaged the floor of the military; and (d) the Defendant owned the floor of the 10,000 square meters and damaged the floor at the expense of the victim.

2. On December 16, 2014, around 22:40 on December 16, 2014, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victim, by putting 10 or more of the instant “D” stations, such as beer disease and the entrance, ceiling, floor, etc. of the main station, protruding off, thereby debrising around 10 minutes of the strike, and by putting about 30 minutes of the noise to customers around the main office, thereby obstructing the victim’s legitimate main office business by force.

3. The Defendant was asked by the police officers F and G belonging to the Gwangju Northern Police Station E-district of the Police Station of the Seoul Northern Police Station, who called the “D,” upon receiving a report on December 16, 2014, and called the “D,” and was asked by the police officers and G about the circumstances of the instant case as above, and did not see the police officers’ flabbbing and flabing the instant police officers’ flabing the flabbbing, which prevented the police officers from doing so in good faith.

After that, the defendant, who was arrested as an offender in the act of obstruction of performance of official duties and was on the front of the main place, string down the patrol vehicle, and walking both bucks, bucks, clothes and breasts of police officers F, and performing legitimate duties in relation to the maintenance of public order and criminal investigation of police officers.

arrow