Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On April 27, 2010, the Plaintiff entered the Army and served in the combat support team of the 17th Team of the Army (hereinafter “instant unit”) and was discharged from active service on February 10, 2012.
B. On November 29, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State and a person eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter “instant application”) with the Defendant, asserting that “the Plaintiff was unable to take the weight of equipment while making a gambling training while serving in the military and going beyond the equipment with the equipment, and both sides of the Plaintiff became disabled” (hereinafter “instant application”).
C. On March 18, 2013, the Defendant rendered a disposition rejecting a person who rendered distinguished services to the State or a person eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter “instant disposition”) regarding the instant application to the Plaintiff.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute between the parties, Gap evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the disposition is lawful;
A. (1) The Plaintiff’s assertion (1) was conducted by a new prosecutor who had more than two times before entering the Gun, and became subject to the assessment of military service, and became more worse due to special training during service while entering the Gun, and suffered the instant wounds.
(2) The Plaintiff was exempted from the reserve forces training due to the instant wounds.
B. (1) On November 2009, before entering the Gun, the Plaintiff received two-time medical treatments from the Central University Hospital on the following occasions: (a) around November 2009, at the Central University Hospital and the knee part of the knee part of the knee part of the knee part of the knee part of the knee part of the knee part; and (b) at the National Institute of Foreign Affairs,
(B) On June 18, 2010, the Plaintiff was admitted to the instant unit’s stage on June 18, 2010, and the Plaintiff complained of the left-hand knee’s identification card. The medical records at that time include from high school knee to knenenenene, a patient who had been knenee-free through a intermittently and has been subjected to an early diagnosis of the knee-ray and a drug room.
(C) The Plaintiff on June 30, 2010.