Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[2] The Defendant, from January 31, 2004 to July 28, 2008, was a general manager who exercises overall control over the overall management of the D hotel (victim E Co., Ltd.) located in Seopopo City C from January 31, 2004 and was the representative director of the said victim company.

1. On March 16, 2007, the Defendant, even though there was an occupational duty to use the corporate card received from the victim company (the Jeju bank visa) for the business of the victim company or the above hotel, in violation of the duty, had 15 motives who completed the course of the U.S. University Camp Operators be accommodated in the above hotel room, and paid 1,820,000 won for the guest room by the above credit card in violation of the duty, and the following year.

3. 17. G Lestop in F in Seopo City of Seopopopo City acquired financial gains equivalent to KRW 2,224,800 in total by paying the above credit card, and caused damage to the above victim company at the same amount.

2. On December 26, 2005, the Defendant, along with his wife and two children, paid 384,810 won of the fee, such as accommodation expenses, etc., to the above corporation card in Taiwan, along with his wife and two children, and paid 384,810 won from that time to December 26, 2007 by the same method as 54 times from that time to December 26, 2007, the Defendant paid 12,097,862 won with the above corporation card, thereby obtaining property benefits equivalent to the said amount, and suffered property damage equivalent to the said amount, to the victim company.

(Attachment Table Nos. 15, 17, 23, 24, 26, 31, and 32 in the table of crimes). [Attachment Table Nos. 15, 17, 23, 24, 26, 31, and 32] [Attachment Table No. 2010] Defendant was in office as professor of I University Tourism and Leisure Department

The defendant, in accordance with the agreement on the entrusted education between the "D hotel" and the I-university, has completed the denial, etc. of the above hotel staff who did not have served in the above hotel with the benefit of 30% of school expenses reduction and exemption when a person who is in office in the above hotel enters the above university, using the benefit of 30% reduction and exemption of school expenses.