logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.06.30 2016가합527009
전직금지 등 청구의 소
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are jointly and severally borne by the Plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On April 7, 2014, the Defendant: (a) was working for the Plaintiff Company; and (b) was working for the Plaintiff Company; and (c) was working for the Plaintiff Company; and (d) was working for the Plaintiff Company on April 7, 2014.

A) On July 12, 2014, while joining and serving as D Responsible Research Institute, the Plaintiff Co., Ltd. and the annual salary of KRW 80 million were concluded on July 12, 2014. Paragraph (9) of the labor contract provides that “In principle, the Defendant shall prepare and submit a written attachment to the Plaintiff Company” (Evidence 3). Accordingly, the Defendant prepared and submitted a written attachment (Evidence 4; hereinafter referred to as “instant attachment”).

As the defendant is admitted to the plaintiff company, he/she shall not disclose, disclose, publish, or divulge any of the following confidential matters to a third party, except with prior written consent of the plaintiff company:

This duty to maintain confidentiality is recognized not only as a period of service, but also as a period of retirement, and it is also valid for three years from the time of retirement, and in violation of this duty to maintain confidentiality, it is assumed that if damage occurs to the plaintiff company, the officers and employees of the plaintiff company, and the third party in good faith, it will be held liable for it.

- - Future -

1. Information related to the plaintiff company or the plaintiff company acquired by oral or written means;

2. Business plan, trade secret, or external expenses of the Plaintiff Company;

3. The Plaintiff Company’s confidential matters 2) on July 26, 2014, under the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act, concluded a license agreement with F (F; hereinafter referred to as F) and F’s bread and products to be manufactured and sold in Korea. The Plaintiff Company concluded a license agreement with F (F; hereinafter referred to as F) on July 26, 2014.

arrow