beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
An application filed by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2013 Highest 1816"
1. Around December 15, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant may receive subsidies from the head office when he/she registers the name of the Party due to the development of the G Research Institute’s livelihood that he/she operates. It differs from that of a Party’s authorized certificate and passbook.”
However, the defendant was thought to receive Internet loans in the name of E using the above authorized certificate and passbook.
Nevertheless, on January 4, 2013, the Defendant: (a) obtained an authorized certificate and passbook in the name of E; (b) accessed the website of the Plaintiff’s HK Savings Bank, using the city located at the seat of the FHK branch office, which was operated by the Defendant on the second floor of HY commercial building 2; (c) applied for a loan under the name of E as if the Defendant was E; and (d) obtained a loan of KRW 6 million from the Defendant to the passbook in the name of E; and (e) changed the name into the victim Hyundai Switzerland Savings Bank, Inc., Hyundai Switzerland Savings Bank, Inc. to the “SBB Savings Bank.”
The "MoS Savings Bank" regardless of any change in the name below is a corporation.
After accessing the website, 5 million won was transferred to E by the head of the Tong in the name of E, and the loan was acquired by means of money.
"2013 Highest 1960"
2. On December 18, 2012, the Defendant received C’s resident registration certificate, passbook(I), authorized certificate, and cellular phone equipment from C by stating that “A private teaching institute’s “GA” from “GAAA” operated by the Defendant in Ha in Y in Y in Y in Y in Y in Y in Y in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City on December 18, 2012, stating that “In order to register the name as an instructor at the GAA, it is necessary to register the name at the headquarters.”
Then, the Defendant, using C’s authorized certificate, etc., is the victim company as if he were C.