1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasons for the court’s explanation concerning this case are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as stated in paragraph (2) below or a new argument in the plaintiff’s trial is added. As such, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Part 6, page 10, column 6, column 10, of the first instance court’s decision to be written or added, is the case where there is an error inside or outside KRW 1,00 in the calculation by the following table X-cell program; hereinafter the same shall apply.”

A. According to the second sentence of the first instance judgment, “Aluminium” in the second sentence shall be “Aluminium.”

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff's assertion of this part of the plaintiff's assertion should be rejected as it constitutes a means of real-time attack and defense. Thus, it is clear in the record that the plaintiff submitted a preparatory document and applied for evidence related to the plaintiff's assertion, but it is difficult to say that the submission of the above preparatory document and the application for evidence were delayed, and there is no special circumstance to deem that the plaintiff delayed the submission of the method of attack and defense by intention or gross negligence. Thus, the defendant's argument cannot be accepted. The plaintiff's assertion is not acceptable. Since the plaintiff's assertion of this part of the plaintiff's assertion should be constructed as a 12 complex manufacturing agent, since the plaintiff's assertion of this part of the plaintiff's assertion should be made as an 12 complex manufacturing agent, the part of the part of this case's construction should not be found as defective.