1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the lower court’s acceptance of the judgment of the first instance is as follows, and the reasoning of the lower judgment is as follows, except for the addition of the judgment as to the Plaintiffs’ assertion emphasized or new in this court, and thus, it is identical to the reasoning of the first instance judgment. As such, this Court cites it in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

The part written after the completion shall be referred to as "B (referring to the plaintiff A)" among the three pages of the judgment of the court of first instance. "B (referring to the plaintiff A)" shall be applied.

Three of the three pages of the judgment of the first instance, "designated person (BS)", among the three pages of the judgment of the first instance, shall be added to "designated person (Plaintiff BS)".

2. Additional determination

A. The plaintiffs' assertion that the defendant director's expression of intention to resign has no effect until it reaches the K General Meeting, which is a superior agency. 1) The defendant's assertion is the "General Meeting of this case" (hereinafter "General Meeting of this case").

(2) According to the rules of the general meeting of this case, the above rules give priority to the application of the rules of the general meeting of this case as affiliated agencies of the defendant, and since all the defendant's directors were dispatched by the general meeting of this case, the expression of resignation of the defendant's director becomes effective when the defendant's director G and H reached the general meeting of this case, which is an agency sending the notice of resignation. However, there is no proof that the defendant's expression of resignation has reached the general meeting of this case prior to the resolution of the board of directors of this case, and the above declaration of resignation has no validity. (2) According to the evidence No. 14, according to the rules of the general meeting of this case, the defendant is operated as an affiliated agency of the above general meeting of this case as a director of the above general meeting of this case (Article 1

However, the following facts, which are acknowledged by the above-mentioned evidence and evidence Nos. 15, 16, 17, and No. 58 and 59, and the purport of the whole pleadings, are inferred by the following facts or the arguments.